Laura Siegemund vs Nao Hibino Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 26 Jul at 04:40 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Siegemund vs N. Hibino

GER
3
Win
Played
0
Win

JPN
3
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Siegemund 3 - 0 Hibino
They have played 7 sets in total, with Laura Siegemund winning 6 and Nao Hibino winning 1. The last match between Laura Siegemund and Nao Hibino was at the Omnium Banque Nationale - Montreal, 26-07-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Laura Siegemund getting the victory 6-1 1-6 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Siegemund | 3 |
| Hibino | 0 |
Last 3 H2H Matches:
(Q3) Omnium Banque Nationale - Montreal(07-26-25)
(Q3) Japan Open Tennis Championships - Osaka(10-13-24)
(R1) Mallorca Open - Mallorca(06-14-16)
L. Siegemund vs N. Hibino H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $3,657,708 | Career Prize Money | $1,614,842 |
| 58.97% (549-382) | Career Total W/L | 54.48% (407-340) |
| 1 | Grass | 0 |
| 2 | Hard | 0 |
| 16 | Titles | 13 |
| 3 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 46.67% (14-16) | YTD Win/Loss | 22.22% (2-7) |
L. Siegemund vs N. Hibino Match Preview:
- Second serve success rate: Siegemund has a slight edge, winning 43.74% of points on second serves compared to Hibino's 40.09%.
- Return game comparison: Siegemund's stronger on opponents' second serves, with 51.83% of points won, while Hibino stands at 49.34%. However, Hibino performs better on first serve returns at 34.84%, against Siegemund's 31.48%.
- Breakpoint resilience: Hibino excels slightly under pressure with a 51.33% breakpoint save rate, over Siegemund's 49.27%.
- Annual match performance: In the past year, Siegemund has a nearly balanced win-loss record at 48.94%, whereas Hibino has registered a 45.61% win rate.
- Surface preferences: Siegemund thrives on clay with 65% career win rate, but is less dominant on hard courts at 51%. Hibino's preference tilts towards hard surfaces, with a 57% win rate, but less favorable on clay at 45%.
- Tour experience: Siegemund commands a slight edge on the Main tour with a 52% win ratio, while Hibino sits at 47.37%.
- Head-to-head record: Question: Who has been more successful in direct encounters? Answer: Siegemund, winning all encounters (2-0) and all sets played (4-0).
- Match duration: Their past matchups average 1 hour and 33 minutes.
- Tiebreaks and pressure moments: Siegemund has downed Hibino in their sole tiebreak battle.
- Opposition caliber: Siegemund has competed against tougher opponents, with an average rank of 103.77, whereas Hibino's opponents averaged a rank of 180.63.
- Deciding set performance: Should the match reach a deciding set, Hibino boasts a stronger track record, winning 67% of such sets in the past year, compared to Siegemund's 36%.
- Breakpoint opportunity conversion: Although marginal, Hibino converts slightly more break opportunities at 36.9% against Siegemund's 36.3%.
- Direct encounter history: When these players clash, Siegemund has historically delivered stronger performances, evidenced by her previous wins over Hibino.
Editorial Prediction (July 26, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming tennis match between Laura Siegemund and Nao Hibino is set to be an intriguing contest. While Siegemund shows a minor advantage in second serve points and has consistently challenged stronger opponents, Hibino demonstrates resilience in crucial moments with superior breakpoint saves and deciding set victories.
Both players have surface preferences that contribute to their gameplay, with Siegemund excelling on clay and Hibino on hard courts. This match being on a hard surface might benefit Hibino slightly; however, Siegemund's consistent head-to-head triumphs provide her with a psychological edge in direct competition.
Considering the stats and past performances, Siegemund seems to hold a slight advantage with her stronger overall return game, experience against higher-ranked opponents, and undivided head-to-head success, making her the likely winner of this impending clash.
Laura Siegemund vs Nao Hibino Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Siegemund vs N. Hibino H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 6 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 38 | Games Won | 25 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 15 | Total Double Faults | 12 |
| 1:42:51 | Average Match Time | 1:42:51 |
| 73% (149/204) | 1st Serve % | 63% (120/190) |
| 65% (97/149) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (65/120) |
| 49% (27/55) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (28/70) |
| 60% (15/25) | Break Pts Won % | 48% (10/21) |
| 51% (97/190) | Return Points Win % | 39% (80/204) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (3/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/3) |
Recent Performance Stats
L. Siegemund Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 6-3 6-0 | ||
R3 | W | 6-4 7-6(2) | ||
R2 | W | 6-7(4) 6-3 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 7-5 4-6 4-1 ret. | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
N. Hibino Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 3-6 7-5 7-5 | ||
R2 | W | 6-3 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 7-5 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 7-5 6-1 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-1 | ||

L. Siegemund vs N. Hibino Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.16% (549/379) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.48% (407/340) |
| 57.31% (1227/914) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.01% (908/805) |
| 52.94% (10356/9205) | Games Win/Loss | 51.53% (8064/7585) |
| 51.56% (149/140) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.70% (292/223) |
| 64.58% (341/187) | Clay Win/Loss | 45.45% (55/66) |
| 52.63% (40/36) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57.78% (26/19) |
| 54.29% (19/16) | Grass Win/Loss | 51.52% (34/32) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 455 | Aces Total | 1023 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 1721 | Total Double Faults | 1612 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:12:54 |
| 483.51 | Average Opponent Rank | 487.48 |
| 70% (25179/35936) | 1st Serve % | 65% (25797/39512) |
| 60% (15144/25179) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (15626/25797) |
| 46% (4959/10739) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (6358/13712) |
| 48% (2247/4717) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (2294/4825) |
| 46% (16788/36343) | Return Points Win % | 45% (17789/39756) |
| 53.33% (48/42) | Slam W/L | 47.56% (39/43) |
| 54.90% (56/46) | Masters W/L | 42.42% (28/38) |
| 57.14% (4/3) | Cups W/L | 56.25% (9/7) |
| 56.25% (144/112) | Main Tour W/L | 48.82% (103/108) |
| 60.35% (239/157) | Challenger W/L | 59.48% (204/139) |
| 75.32% (58/19) | Futures W/L | 82.76% (24/5) |
| 59% (540/914) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (400/735) |
| 60% (3/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 40% (2/5) |
| 51% (96/187) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (87/152) |
| 54% (157/291) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (125/223) |
| 87% (530/459) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (385/331) |
| 13% (530/71) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (385/52) |
| 22% (397/89) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (362/73) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Polina Kudermetova vs Camilla Rosatello Prediction – WTA Open In Arte Angers Loire – 1st December 2025 Best Bets

Argentina Open – Buenos Aires Preview And Prediction: Varvara Lepchenko vs Panna Udvardy Betting Tips & Picks November 30, 2025

Mayar Sherif vs Varvara Lepchenko Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

Mayar Sherif vs Varvara Lepchenko Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

James Duckworth vs Dane Sweeny Prediction – ATP Playford Challenger – 29th November 2025 Best Bets
